Keblinger

Keblinger

Pages

Some Popular Misconceptions of the Muslims

0
| Wednesday, 30 May 2012


Individuals who stay away from practicing Islam despite being Muslims, fall into two broad categories: There is one group whose apparent association with Islam owes itself entirely to the accident of birth. They retain their Muslim names and participate in some of the socially significant Islamic events only to maintain their apparent Muslim identity. They are neither convinced about the truthfulness of the message of Islam nor are they interested in following it sincerely. Few people would dispute the claim that their Muslim identity is only a this-worldly arrangement and that on the Day of Judgment their claim to Islam would be discarded.
The second category consists of those people who take pride in acknowledging the veracity of Islam. They make attempts to follow its teachings as far as convenience is not threatened to be compromised. However, a closer look at their lifestyles reveals that, much the same way as the first group, they too are in fact immersed in their greed for their this-worldly life. Their practical contact with the Shariah is strictly confined to the narrow limits allowed by the predominance of their worldly objectives. Thus they care to follow only that part of Islam which is consistent with the contemporary fashion or which at least does not run contrary to its requirements. Their real happiness is associated with worldly successes; they are genuinely grieved only over worldly privations. Despite this completely 'one-eyed' approach to life, they are fully convinced that the exciting prospects of the other life too are, beyond doubt, going to be for them to enjoy. Whatever be the truth about their motives, at least some of them defend their approach by presenting arguments, some of which are apparently based on Quran and Sunnah. It is important, therefore, that a dispassionate analysis of those arguments be made to help them realize that the superstructure of their expectations is based upon extremely fragile foundations.
The gist of their arguments is being presented below. People belonging to this category do not generally present all the listed arguments. In fact, in most cases, it is only one of the described reasons that is cited to absolve the individual from taking the obligations of the Shariah seriously.
One popular argument presented is that the most predominant attribute of Allah Almighty is Mercy. How, then is it possible that the Almighty is going to allow us to be consigned to Hell when we are following at least some part of Islam along side pursuing our worldly ambitions. Another argument offered is that since we have the privilege of being the followers of the last and the favourite Prophet of Allah (sws), and since it is a well known fact that Allah Almighty will grant to his Prophet (sws) the right to intercede for his followers, how is it possible that the Prophet's intercession will not come to our rescue. Even if the sinning side of our balance would be heavier, intercession of the Prophet (sws) will make amends for that.
According to a third argument, many traditions of the Prophet (sws) confirm that all those people who had recited the Kalimah shall enter Paradise, and that since we were born to Muslim families and got the privilege of reciting the Kalimah many times. Who then can deny us this birth right of ours.A little more reasonable amongst this group present a seemingly more logical argument for the defence of their case. There is no doubt, they say, that we are sinners and are violating Allah's law on a fairly regular basis, however, we do keep seeking His forgiveness during prayers and even outside prayers. It is quite clear from the contents of the Quran and Sunnah that repentance cleanses one's sins. After this knowledge, why should we make our lives unnecessarily miserable by following all aspects of the Shariah. What's so wrong, after all, in a compromise between a this-worldly and a that-worldly attitude?
Finally, there is another argument presented: The Shari`ah has two types of injunctions: those which are directly relevant to Allah and those that have to do with one's obligations towards fellow humans. While the latter category of injunctions are more important to be followed, the obligations towards Allah are not. If we are telling the truth, refraining from getting involved in bribes, helping the poor, keeping our promises, and strictly adhering to other similar injunctions, why then shall we not be successful in the Hereafter just for not saying prayers regularly, or not fasting, or not going for Hajj and not following similar injunctions which are matters of personal relevance between the individual and his God. When scales are going to be drawn on the Day of Judgement, how is it possible that our significantly important good deeds will not be able outweigh the relatively less important blemishes.
Let us analyze these arguments to find out whether they do merit the confidence of those who are using them for justifying their life patterns or not.

1. Mercy of God

The Quran indeed informs us that Allah's mercy dominates everything else:
My mercy enfolds everything. (7: 156)
The very beginning of the Quran mentions two names of God Almighty: al-Rahman and al-Rahim, both describing the profoundness of His mercy. If one were to find the thematic link between the first two verses of Surah al-Rahman, it emerges quite clearly that the decision of sending down the Divine Revelation also owes entirely to His attribute of mercy. It says:
The Gracious God; He taught the Quran. (55:1-2)
The Quran has, however, clarified another point as well: that the people who are really worthy of being treated compassionately by the Gracious God are those who as a consequence of their correct attitude are found deserving of it.
The blessing of Allah is at hand for those who do good. (7:56)
On another occasion it has been clarified by the Quran that the mercy of Allah has in fact been laid down for the God-conscious followers of the Prophets:
... My mercy enfolds everything. I shall enjoin it for those who ward off (evil) and pay the Zakat and believe in Our signs . Those who follow the messenger ... (7:156-7)
It is the same mercy which has been referred to by the Almighty while urging His servants who continue to be engulfed in sins not to give up hope, since such people tread the line of sin only because they have lost hope in Allah's mercy; therefore, they have been comforted by being informed that Allah can forgive all sins provided man ensures serious attempts at correction of his attitude:
Say: O my servants who have sinned against their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allah. Surely, Allah forgives all sins. Indeed, He is Most Forgiving, Ever Merciful. And turn to your Lord and submit yourselves to Him, before there comes unto you the punishment; for then you shall not be helped. And follow the best Teaching that has been revealed to you from your Lord, before the punishment comes upon you suddenly, while you perceive not. (39:53-55)
These verses show beyond doubt that if a person wants himself to be regarded as deserving of the mercy of the Almighty, it is imperative that he should incline himself towards Allah and correct his attitude. It is noticeable that even after the emotionally moving mention of His mercifulness, Allah has still warned those who are not obedient to Him of grave consequences. This shows beyond doubt the fact that only those people deserve Allah's mercy who show through their conduct that they are genuinely looking for it and are not just pretending.

2. The Prophet's Intercession

There is no doubt that the Quran indicates that Allah Almighty shall grant the privilege of intercession to some of His chosen people. However, a proper understanding of the conditions laid down in the Quran for the administration of intercession should preclude an individual who is genuinely seeking success in the hereafter from pinning his hopes on that arrangement. The conditions laid down in the Quran for the administration of intercession are the following:
1. No one shall dare to speak out on the Day of Judgement without Allah's leave. 2. The intercessor shall be able to intercede only for individuals specified for the purpose. 3. The intercessor shall speak nothing but the truth.
The Quran says:
On the day when the Spirit and the angels will stand in rows, they shall not speak, except he whom the Gracious God will grant leave, and who will speak only what is right. (78:38)
The very next verse warns that the Day of Judgement is an undeniable reality; therefore, whosoever wants his real welfare should leave aside the strategy of pinning hopes on false supports and should, instead, adopt the path outlined by God Almighty so as to save himself from the ignominy of that day:
That day is sure to come. So whosoever likes may prepare a way to his Lord. (78:39)
A similar clarification has been offered in another verse of the Quran thus:
And who can intercede with Him except by His leave? (2:255)
Authentically transmitted traditions of the Prophet (sws) also inform that the Prophet (sws) had warned some of his very close relatives individually of the grave consequences they were likely to face if they would not prepare themselves for their accountability, for on the day of judgement no soul shall be able to come to the rescue of another. A tradition mentions that when the verse carrying the message "And warn your near relations" (26:214) was revealed, the Prophet (sws) stood up and said:
O people of Quraysh! save your skins from the Hell-fire because I will not be able to come to your rescue on the Day of Judgement. O 'Abd Munaf! I won't be able to save you an inch from (the wrath of) Allah Almighty. O 'Abbas, son of `Abd al-Muttalib! I will not be able to help you out [from the punishment of] Allah. O Safiyyah, the messenger of Allah's Aunt, I wouldn't be able to help you [on the Day of Judgement] from the punishment of Allah. O Fatimah daughter of Muhammad! You can ask anything from my [worldly wealth; as for the hereafter, however], I will not be able to save you from Allah's grip. (Bukhari, Kitab al-Wasaya)
The Quran has categorically denied in two different passages in Surah al-Baqarah -- one of the two addressing the progeny of Israel, and the other one, Muslims -- all possibilities of intercession coming to the rescue of individuals, in order to emphasize that it is faith and good deeds alone that are going to help one out on the day of judgement. In the absence of these, none shall be allowed to interfere in the Divine proceedings of implementation of justice. The Quran says:
Children of Israel! ... And guard yourselves against the day when no soul shall serve as a substitute for another soul at all, nor shall intercession be accepted for it, nor shall ransom be taken from it, nor shall they be helped. (2:47-8)
The second passage says:
O you who believe! Spend out of what we have bestowed on you before the day comes wherein there shall be no buying and selling, nor friendship, nor intercession, and it is those who disbelieve that do wrong to themselves. (2:254)
After these references from the Quran and Hadith, the only question that remains to be answered is that if there is such categorical negation of intercession in the original sources, what then is the context of those Ahadith which give considerable details of intercession that will be done by the Prophet (sws) for the benefit of his followers. What emerges on reflecting upon the information in the original sources of Islam in this regard is that on the Day of Judgement when the good and the bad deeds will be weighed, some people would succeed with flying colours, while others would face the ignominy of failure. However, it appears, that there would still remain one group of people who would be falling on the margin. Allah's mercy would necessitate that they be spared from punishment. Therefore, the Almighty, in order to elevate the status of some of the noblest people on that day will permit them to intercede for such individuals who will be found on the margin. The intercession, it is reported, will be duly accepted. This intercession will not necessitate the violation of any of the inviolable principles of justice of God Almighty.

3. Salvation for the Reciter of Kalimah

The confusion on the question of salvation for the reciter of Kalimah owes itself to the improper understanding of the Quran and Hadith. The Quran makes it unmistakably clear that Allah Almighty has not made salvation in the Hereafter incumbent upon an individual's formal association with a particular group. The Book stresses that the success in the Hereafter is guaranteed only for those who fulfil the criterion of faith and righteous deeds. The Quran says:
Sure the believers and the Jews and the followers of Christ and the Sabians, whoever believes in God and the last Day, and whoever does right, shall have his reward with his Lord and they will neither have fear nor regret. (2:62)
This verse clarifies that there are only two preconditions for salvation in the hereafter: faith in Allah, in the Hereafter, in the Prophets, and righteous deeds. A person satisfying these conditions, whenever he lived, shall stand successful in the eyes of Allah. As for those who relish the prospects of residing in the pleasures of the Paradise merely on getting enrolled in the list of the followers of a Prophet, they have been clearly informed about the impertinence of their expectations in the following verse:
Neither your wishes [O Muslims] nor the wishes of the people of the Book [are going to matter]; whosoever does ill will be punished for it, and will find no protector or friend apart from God; but he who performs good deeds, whether man or a woman, and is a believer, will surely enter the Paradise, and none shall be deprived even of an iota of his reward. (5:123-4)
One comes to learn on reading the Quran that much the same way as the present-day Muslims, a group of people belonging to the Children of Israel also believed that reciting the Kalimah was enough for their salvation. Their intransigence of not to accept the Prophethood of Mohammed (sws) owed a great deal to this creed. The Book of Allah rejects their claim in such clear terms that the divine words remain an eye opener for all people who care to read it:
They say: The fire will not touch us for more than a few days. Say: Have you so received a promise from Allah so that Allah will not withdraw His pledge or do you impute things to Allah for which you have no knowledge at all? (2:80)
The unequivocal verdict of the Quran, however, leaves the relevance of the promise to the reciters of Kalimah in the Ahadith unanswered. Although Ahadith carrying a similar message are numerous, the following one from the book of Imam Muslim clearly explains the proper context of most of them carrying a similar message:
The one who dies knowing that there is no God but Allah shall enter the Paradise. (Muslim, Kitab al-Iman)
Two clarifications would facilitate the understanding of these narratives:
First, the very recitation of the kalimah for those who were the audience of this statement necessitated defying the contemporary system, abandoning the faith of their forefathers, earning the hatred of all those who had turned against the Prophet (sws). The recitation of the same kalimah now is done invariably by people who mindlessly utter the words without making any effort to find what their meanings entail. Nothing could be more naive than the expectations of people who believe that they are the worthy receivers of the good tidings of Paradise on the basis of a mere utterance of this statement. The Quran, on the contrary repeatedly affirms that it is not mere utterance of the claim to faith that is desired of an individual; what is required, on the contrary, is the attitude that proves that his claim is not just a hollow utterance but, instead, is based on real sincerity:
Do men think they will get away by saying: we believe and they will not be tried? We had tried those who were before them so that Allah knew who spoke the truth, and who were liars. (29:2-3)
Second, if a person accepts Allah as His God, it is not possible for him to continue to remain disobedient to Him. It is indeed possible for him to falter morally, may be every now and then, owing to his human failings. However, if he is a true believer, he would certainly correct his behaviour on realizing his fault and would feel ashamed of what he had done. The Quran clarifies quite clearly that Allah's favourite servants do not deliberately insist on their sinful behaviour:
Allah loves those who are upright and those who, when they commit a shameful act or wrong themselves, remember Allah and implore forgiveness for their sins -- and who can forgive sins except Allah -- and do not knowingly persist in what they do. (3:135-6)
Another passage of the Quran informs that for the pious, sins appear by default, not by design; for them, sinning is not a rule; it is only an exception that is immediately succeeded by feelings of embarrassment. The Quran says:
To Allah belongs whatever is in the heavens and the earth, that He may requite those who do evil, in accordance with their deeds, and those who do good with good. As for those who avoid the greater sins and shameful acts, except minor trespasses, your Lord is Master of vast forgiveness. (53:31-2)
On appreciating the above two clarifications, one realises that the glad tidings given by the Prophet (sws) were exactly consistent with the Quran which confers him with the status of a bearer of glad tidings (Mubashshir). The Quran says:
O Prophet: We have sent you as a witness and a bearer of happy tidings and an admonisher. (33:45)
It was important that this tiding be communicated for the benefit of specially those believers who are particularly sensitive about their sins and, therefore, have a propensity to fall into a psychological abyss of profound despair even on committing only a few sins. Such devoted believers have been consoled by being informed that the all-important objective of finding a niche in the heaven is not unachievable. The only requirement for an individual to be able to achieve that goal is a firm commitment with the Kalimah. However, since it was a likely possibility that the less discerning minds would not be able to pick the real spirit from the context of the message and could, as a consequence, relinquish their commitment to following the message, the Prophet (sws), on the urging of his companion 'Umar, desired that the message not be communicated to the common people. The relevant passage of a hadith from the book of Imam Muslim says:
`Umar said: O Prophet of Allah, for you be sacrificed my close kin, did you send Abu Hurayrah with your shoes so that he may give glad tidings of the heaven to all those he comes across who say: There is no god except Allah from the core of his heart? He, may Allah's blessings be on him, said: I did. 'Umar said: [I would suggest you] don't do that way, because I fear people might rely unnecessarily upon its apparent meanings [and stop practicing Islam]. So [I suggest you just] leave them to practice. The Prophet, may Allah's mercy be on him, said: Then, leave them [and let this message not be communicated to them]. (Kitab al-Iman)

4. Repentance

There is little doubt that repentance cleanses an individual of all his sins. Allah Almighty forgives an individual when he decides to correct his attitude. The Quran confirms that if repentance is done with all conditions properly fulfilled, God Almighty accepts it as matter of principle:
Allah does accept repentance, but only of those who are guilty of an evil out of ignorance yet quickly repent, and Allah turns to them again, for Allah is All-Knowing and All-Wise. But He does not accept the repentance of those who continue indulging in evil until death draws near and they say: We now repent; nor of those who die disbelieving. For them We have a grievous retribution in wait. (4:17-8)
Thus writes Amin Ahsan Islahi in his commentary of these verses:
On reflecting upon these verses, one finds two conditions for the acceptability or otherwise of repentance. Those who sin under the influence of emotions and then repent immediately (on realizing their error) and correct their attitude, Allah Almighty has vowed to accept their repentance. On the contrary, repentance is not accepted of such who continue to sin and care to repent only when the angel of death reaches them, nor is it accepted in the case of those who die in a state of disbelief. One question that still remains even after the clear delineation of the two extreme cases is regarding the fate of those individuals who, although do not get the opportunity of repenting immediately after committing a sin, yet do not delay until the appearance of death to perform it. The verse is silent regarding such cases, which evinces both hope and fear. That seems to be the very purpose behind the absence of a mention of the treatment of this category so that people belonging to it should continue to remain between the conditions of fear and hope. However, it does occur in one's mind occasionally that people from the Muslim Ummah belonging to this category shall get the benefit of the intercession of the Prophet (sws) because there does not seem to be any reason why such people should not be entitled to intercession. (Tadabbur'ul Quran, Vol 2 [Lahore: Faran Foundation, 1991], p. 267)
What exactly is the repentance that satisfies all conditions to justify for the doer a clear case for being forgiven? The author of Riyad al-Salihin has responded to this question by drawing from the opinions of a large number of scholars. He writes thus:
Thus say the scholars: To repent on committing a crime is mandatory. If a sin is committed against Allah alone, then there are only three conditions: First, man should desist from repeating the crime; second, he should regret his action; and third, he ought to make a firm commitment that he is not going to repeat the crime in future. If any one of these three conditions is not met, the repentance done shall not be valid. If the sin committed has to do with a fellow human being, then in addition to the afore-mentioned three conditions a fourth one is for the sinner to compensate the aggrieved individual against whatever loss has been inflicted upon him. For instance, if he has deprived an individual of his valuables, the sinner should duly return them to the rightful owners. If pain has been inflicted upon a person, he should be allowed to respond with a similar injury or else he should be requested to forgive. If a person has been backbitten against, he should be approached by the sinner to get the apology accepted from him.
A sinner must repent for all his crimes. If he repents in the case of some and stays away from doing it in the case of others, he will continue to remain obliged to repent for the remaining crimes. The verdict of Quran, the Sunnah, and the consensus of all the scholars of the Muslim Ummah is unequivocal on the obligatory nature of the need to repent is obvious beyond doubt.
The attitude of many of the Muslims, however, is quite to the contrary. They continue to violate with impunity the unquestionably obvious injunctions of the Shariah and yet take refuge in the comforting thought that they shall be pardoned. How very similar this attitude is to that of the unworthy successors of the early generations of the Children of Israel about whose behaviour the Quran informs us thus:
Then after them a new generation inherited the Book. They took to the goods of this base world, and said: We shall surely be forgiven this. Yet they will accept similar things if they came their way again. (7:169)

Differentiating Important Directives from Unimportant Ones

Directives of the Islamic Shariah, if viewed from a peculiar point of view can be divided into two categories: the rights of Allah and the rights of the fellow human beings. However, one would need to be a complete ignorant on matters of Islamic understanding to claim that whereas the real desirable directives are those belonging to the former and as for the rights of Allah, their status is only secondary. The truth is that the one directive of the Islamic Shariah which has been described as the most significant requires Muslims to hold fast to the unity of Allah and stay away from ascribing partners to Him. The Quran says:
Surely, Allah will not forgive that a partner be associated with Him; but He will forgive whatever is short of that to whomsoever He pleases. And who so associates partners with Allah has indeed devised a very great sin. (4:48)
It goes without saying that to uphold the requirements of the unity of Allah is a right of Allah to the complete exclusion of the human beings. The most important right of the human beings is that of the parents. The Quran has mentioned this extremely important right only after mentioning the right of Allah, thus clarifying the relative significance of the different injunctions within the scheme of the teachings of Islamic Shariah. The Quran says:
So your Lord has decreed: Do not worship any one but Him, and be good to your parents. (17:23)
Likewise, the commonly held view amongst the masses that man was created by Allah to care for his fellow human beings, otherwise angels were enough to take care of the objective of worshipping Him is a misleading contention. The Quran declares that:
And I have not created the jinn and the men but that they may worship Me. (51:56)
Allah Almighty desires from His believers that, instead of getting involved in the unnecessary debate of the important and the less important directives, they should adopt the Islamic Shariah completely:
O you who believe, enter the fold of Islam completely, and do not follow in the footsteps of Satan; he is indeed your open enemy. (2:208)
This verse clearly shows that those people who do not enter the fold of Islam fully but are instead inclined to have simultaneous allegiance with both Islam and kufr, are following the footsteps of Satan. Satan, indeed is man's declared enemy. The attitude of Muslims towards Islamic directives is no different from that of the Children of Israel of the time when the Quran was being revealed in that they too used to pick and choose from the Shariah at will. The directives that were found easier to follow, acceptable to the people, and in accordance with the fashion of the times were followed wholeheartedly; however, those injunctions which did not appear to be easy to follow were conveniently ignored by them. The Quran condemned their behaviour thus:
Do you then believe a part of the Book and reject a part? There is no other award for them who so act but disgrace in the world, and on the Day of Judgement the severest of punishment; for Allah is not heedless of all that you do. (2:85)

Conclusion

The Quran tells us that whosoever desires the pleasure of Allah and success in the Hereafter, should ensure that he believes in all aspects of Islam, makes an earnest attempt to follow it as far as is possible, stays away from disobeying Allah and His messenger, and attaches more importance to the considerations of life of the other world than those of the present one. The Book of Allah doesn't guarantee success in the next life to any one falling short of fulfilling these conditions. The Quran says:
Then the one who had been rebellious and who preferred the life of the world, will surely have Hell for his abode. But he who feared standing before his Lord, and restrained his self from vain desires, will surely have Paradise for abode. (79:37-41)
Muslims would do well to stay away from the futile exercise of living under the cloud of misleading concepts and to stick to the task of making every possible effort to meet the conditions necessary for success in the hereafter. In that case, they can justifiably hope for the mercy of Allah. Allah, it is earnestly hoped, will be kind and merciful to them.

پاکستان کیخلاف اصل سازش

0
| Friday, 18 May 2012
Syed-Talat-Hussain-300x179-28683_200x1861

سید طلعت حسین





courtesy: Saach TV

What is Hizb-ut-Tahrir? Part 1

0
| Sunday, 13 May 2012

Founded by Taqi ud-Din an-Nabahani, a MU'TAZILEE and ASH'AREE in thought and belief, this group has made the restoration of the Khilafah the main focus of its call why we should expose the evil of this group and its offshoot because if you see the Aqeedah and manhaj of their founding leaders, who are looked upon as mujaddid and great scholars you will be shocked, They want us to jump from the first stage (tarbiyah - nurtuting/educating upon proper knowledge/ aqeedah) to stage of khilafah but they will fail; since the first stage the companions went through tarbiyah - since to carry Islam on you shoulders requires a lot of patience etc... but the closest thing for them is to work for khilaafah and do not talk about anything else, sin transgression etc... AND PLUS THEY have led to the birth of destructive political movements, as well as promoting unIslamic revolutionary modes of thought. jamaa'at-e-islaami, sim ,sio, simi, Hizb ut-Tahreer, Ikhwaani, iy, icc, etc. they all have same methodology, means they all have same manhaj.



THE GRAVE MISTAKE OF THE DENIERS OF 
THE PUNISHMENT OF THE GRAVES



The founder of the modernist Hizb-ut-Tahreer, like the 'Mutazilah before, also denied 'Aqeedah in the Punishment of the Grave-explaining his position by saying:
"Indeed ,from them (the aahaad ahaadeeth) are those which require and action, so it is acted upon. So from Abu Hurairah who said: The Messenger of Allaah (saw) said: "When any of you finishes the last tashahhud, he should seek refuge with Allaah from the four things: from the punishment of the Hellfire, from the punishment of the Grave, from the trials of life and death from the evil trials of the Dajjal" And from 'Aaishah: from the Prophet (saw), that he used to make supplication in the prayer: "O Allaah! I seek refuge in You from the punishment of the Grave, I seek refuge in You from the trials of the Maseehud-Dajjal, I seek refuge in You from the trials of life and death.O Allaah! I seek refuge in You from debt and sin" So these two ahaadeeth are 'Aahaad narrations and they contain the requirement of an action, ir to carry out this supplication after finishing the 'tashahhud'. So it is recommended to make this supplication after finishing 'tashahhud and it is permissible to make 'tasdeeq (attest) what is contained in them. However, "what is 'haraam (forbidden)' is to hold it with certainty-meaning to have it as part of ones 'aqeedah-as long as it only been reported in the aahaad hadeeth, adhannee (non- mutawaatir) proof.However ,if it occurs in 'mutawaatir form,then it is obligatory to make it part of one 'aqeedah" (Ad-Dawsiyyah (p.6) of Taqeedu-Deen an-Nabahaanee-the founder of Hizbut-Tahrir -may Allaah forgive him)
 This saying contains a number of 'shortcomings:
1)Differentiating between the 'aahaad and 'mutawaatir' ahadeeth in matters of 'aqeedah' is an innovation of the 'Qadariyyah' and the 'Mutazilah'-as has already been explained.
2)Making 'tasdeeq' of the Punishment in the Grave, whilst forbidding a person to have 'aqeedah' (belief) in it, is a contradiction in terms. Since-as has preceded in the words of al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr-'tasdeeq' is attesting the truth of something in the heart, which is the same as 'aqeedah' and which thereby necessitates 'eemaan'. However, differentiating between 'tasdeeq' and 'aqeedah' is innovated speech; opposing the way of our Salaf. Unfortunately,the likes of this innovation has been clearly stated by the present leader of 'Hizbut-Tahrir in Britain, when he said: "We trust it; and I encourage all of you 'an tasaddiqoo bi 'adhaabil-Qabr(to have 'tasdeeq in the Punishment of the Grave). I encourage all of you 'antasaddiqoo bi awdatil-Mahdee (to have 'tasdeeq' in the coming of the Mahdee). I encourage you for that. "But whoever believes in that, he is sinful" (From an available taped lecture entitled: 'Punishment of the Grave (Regents Park Mosque,2nd May 1992 CE] by Omar Bakri Muhammad.)
3)How is it possible to affirm Punishment of the Grave with the tongue, whilst forbid 'aqeedah' (belief) of it in the heart-is this not but 'nifaaq' (hypocrisy)?! Rather, Eemaan in the Punishment of the Grave necessitates-as a foundation -'aqeedah in the heart!! May Allaah have mercy upon Imaam Ahmad when he said: "You should beware of speaking about an issue in which you are not preceded by a scholar" (Quoted by Ibn al-Qayyimin A'laamul-Muqieen(4/266))
4)Along with all this it must be remembered that: "It is not permissible to invent an interpretation about an 'Aayah or about a Sunnah, which was not there in the time of 'Salaf'; nor did they have any knowledge about it; nor explain it to the Ummah. Since this would imply that the ' Salaf' were ignorant of the truth in this matter and failed to reach it ,whereas the late coming opponent is somehow guided to the truth!" (As-Saarimul- Munkee (p.247) of al-Haafidh Ibn 'Abdul-Haadee.)
Imaam al-Awzaee(d.157H)(rh)-said: "Hold fast to the narrations of the 'Salaf', even if people were to abandon you. Beware of the opinions of the people ,no matter how much they beautify it with their speech" (Related by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadee in his excellent book Sharafu Ashaabul-Hadeeth (p.7)
Abu Haneefah(d.159H)(rh)-said: "Stick to the 'athar' (narration) and the way of the 'Salaf' and beware of newly invented matters, for all of it is innovation" (Related by as-Suyootee in Sawnul-Mantaq wal-Kalaam(p.32)
So denying 'Aqeedah' in the Punishment of the Grave, declaring this to be something sinful and forbidden, declaring also that it is not matter which will definitely occur, but it is a matter which may possibly occur-is speech in opposition to that of the Salaf-us-Saalih -the like of which was previously uttered by only the 'Khawaarij and a group from the 'Mutazilah' and there is no doubt in its being a deviation from the straight path.
Likewise outwardly affirming 'tasdeeq' and[ apparently] affirming eemaan in the punishment of the Grave, whilst denying 'Aqeedah' in it, is a contradiction in terms-since tasdeeq, eemaan and Aqeedah in the opinion of the 'Salaf', all imply certainty and being definite-even if modernists dislike this!
Imaam Ahmad(d.241H)(rh) said: "Punishment of the Grave is a true fact; and no one denies it except who is misguided and misguiding others" (Tabaqqatul-Hanaabilah (1/174) of Ibn Abee Yalaa.)
An-Naasiree(d.652H) said in 'An-Noorul-Laami(no.110): "We have "eemaan' in the Punishment in the grave and its bliss....this is the madhabs of Ahlus-Sunnah wal- Jamaah. So it is obligatory to have 'Aqeedah' in this"
An-Nawawee(d.676H) said in Sharh Saheeh Muslim(5/85): "This chapter shows the excellence of seeking refuge-between the Tashahhudd and the Tasleem -from these (four) matters; and in it is an affirmation of the punishment of the Grave, and it is the position of the people of the truth-as opposed to the Mutazilah"
Imaam al-Qurtubee(d.671H)(rh) said: "To have eemaan in the Punishment in the Grave and its trials is obligatory, due to what the most truthful (the Prophet (saw) has mentioned. This is he belief of 'Ahlus-Sunnah wal_jamaah" (At-Tadhkirah bi Ahwaalil-Mawtee wa Ahwaalil-Aakhirah(p.137) of Imaam al-Qurtubee (d.671H)

1)Sufyan ibn 'Uyainah(d.197H)(rh) said: "The Sunnah is ten.Whosoever accepts them has completed the Sunnah and whoever abandons anything from them has abandoned the Sunnah; affirming al-Qadr (predestination ),giving precedence to AbuBakr and Umar, the Pond in Paradise, Shafaa (Intercession), the Scales, the Bridge over Hellfire, Emaan is statement and action, the Qur'ân is the speech of Allaah, Punishment in the Grave, being raised up on the day of Judgement and not testifying that any Muslim will definitely be in Paradise or Hell"(Sharh Usool Itiqaah Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaah(no.312) of al-Laalikaee.)


2)Imaaam ash-Shafiee(d.204H)(rh) said: "Indeed al-Qadr (predestination): both the good and evil consequences are from Allaah -the Mighty and Majestic. Indeed Punishment of the Grave is a true fact, the questioning of those in the graves is a true fact, the Resurrection is a true fact, the Accountability is a true fact, Paradise and Hellfire are true facts. Whatever else is related in the Sunnah and so mentioned by the scholars and their followers throughout the lands of the Muslims is also true" (Manaaqibush-Shafiee(1/415) of al-Bayhaqee)
3)Imaaam Ahmad (d.241H)(rh) said: "From the essential Sunnah ,which if a person leaves anyone of its points-not accepting it and not having eemaan in it-then he will not be from its people are: (he then mentions ) eemaan in the Punishment of the Grave"(Usoolus-Sunnah(no.8) of Imaam Ahmad.) He also said: "Punishment of the Grave is a true fact. The servant will be questioned about his Religion and his Lord. Munkir and Nakeer and Paradise and Hellfire are also true facts" (Risaalatus-Sunnah(p.72) of Imaam Ahmad.)
4)Abu Dawood (d.275H)(rh) said: "Chapter: Questioning in the Grave and the Punishment of the Grave"(Kitaabus-Sunnah(p.900) part of Sunan Abee Dawood.)
5)Ibn Qutaybah(d.278H)(rh) said: "Ashaabul-Hadeeth are united upon the fact that whatever Allaah wills happens and whatever He does not will does not happen ;that He is the creator of good and evil; that the Quraan is the speech of Allaah, uncreated, that Allaah will be seen on the Day of Judgement, giving precedence to Abu Bakr and 'Umar, upon eemaan in the punishment of the Grave. They do not differ in these fundamentals. Whosoever opposes them in any of these matters then they reject, hate and declare such a one an innovator and cut themselves off from him" (Taweel Mukhtaaliful-Hadeeth(p.18)
6)Imaam at-Tahaawee(d.321H)(rh) said: "This is an explanation of the 'Aqeedah' of Ahlus-Sunnaj wal-Jamaah upon the way of scholars of this religion; Abu Haneefah an-Nauman ibn Thaabit al-Kofee, Abu Yousuf Yaqoob ibn Ibraheem al-Ansaree and Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn al-Hasanash ash-Shaybanee-may Allaah be pleased with them all-and the beliefs they held concerning the fundamentals of of the deen and their Aqeedah in the Lord of the worlds. "Up until when he said: "We have eemaan in the Angel of Death who is charged with taking the souls of all the worlds; and in the 'Punishment of the Grave for those who deserve it "('Aqeedatut-Taahaawiyah(nos 79-80)
7)Abdul-Hasan al-Asharee(d.324H)(rh) -said:  "The Mutazilah denied Punishment in the grave. It has been related from the Prophet (saw) by many ways and by his Companions (rta). Nothing has been related from a single one of them denying or negating this, to the point when there is ijmaa (comcensus) from the Companions of the Prophet (saw) "(Al-Ibaanah'an Usoolid-Diyaamah(p.201)He also said: "There is consensus that the Punishment of the grave is a true fact, and that people will be tested and questioned in their graves. So may Allaah, establish us with what He loves'( Risaalah ilaa Ahlith-Thaghr (p.279) of Abul-hasan al-Asharee.)
8)Imaam al-Aajuree(d.360H)(rh) said: "Chapter: tasdeeq (affirmation) and eemaan in the punishment of the Grave "In which he brings many of the ahaadeeth related by al-Bukhaaree and Muslim and ends the chapter by saying: "So what is the condition of those who deny these ahaadeeth except that they have deviated very far and are in a huge loss"(Ash-Shareaah(pp.358-364) of al-Aajuree.)
9)Ibn Abee Haatim (d.327H)(rh) said: "Our chosen way is to follow the Messenger of Allah (saw), the sahaabah, the Tabieen and all those who followed them in goodness, along with abandoning looking into the innovated matters, to hold fast to the way of the Ahlul-Athar (People of narrations), such as Abu 'Abdullah Ahmad bin Hanbal, Ishaaq ibn Ibraheem, Abu 'Abdullah Ahmad bin Hanbal,Ishaaq ibn Ibraheem ,Abu 'Ubayd al-Qaasim ibn Salaam and ash-Shafiee, to hold fast to the Book, the Sunnah and the way of the Imaams who follow the narrations of the Salaf ,adopting what was adopted by Ahlus-sunnah from the various cities" Up until his saying: "Faith increases and decreases and we have eemaan in the Punishment of the grave "(Ahlus-Sunnah waI'tiqaadud-Deen (no.14)
10)Imaam al-Barbaharee(d.329H)(rh) -said: "Eemaan in the punishment of the grave and Munkir and Nakeer" (Sharhus-Sunnah(no.18)
11)Al-Ismaeelee(d.371H)(rh)- said: "Know -may Allaah have mercy upon us and you-that the way of Ahlul-Hadeeth ,Ahlus-sunnah wal-Jamaah is to affirm belief in Allaah, His angels, His messengers and to accept whatever is recorded in the Book of Allaah-the Most high-and what is authentically related from the Messenger of Allaah (saw) until he said: "Punishment in the Grave is a true fact" (Itiqaad A'immatul-Hadeeth(no.22)
12)Al-Qayrawaanee(d.386H) (rh) said: Under the chapter: "What is related in the Sunnah about the Aqeedah of the heart from the obligatory matters of the Deen. From this is: Eemaan in the heart and pronouncing with the tongue that Allaah is the only deity worthy of worship, none has the right to be worshipped except Him" Up until his saying: "And punishment in the Grave is a true fact and the Believers will be tested in their graves" (Related by Ibn al-Qayyim in Ijtimaa 'ul-Juyooshil-Islmaayihah(p.152)
13)Ibn Abee Aamneen(d.399H)(rh) said:  "Ahlus-Sunnah have eemaan in the Punishment of the Grave, may Allaah protect us and you from this"(Usoolus-Sunnah(Q.7)
14)Imaam al-Laalikaaee(d.418H)-(rh) said: "Chapter: a report of what is related from the Prophet(saw) with regards to the fact that when the Muslims are lowered into their graves,they will be questioned by Munkar and Nakeer, and that Punishment in the grave is a true fact and eemaan in it is obligatory" (Sharh Usool Itiqaad Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaah (6/1127) of al-Laaliaaee.)
15)Imaam al-Bayhaqee(d.458H)(rh) said: "Chapter: Eemaan in the punishment of the Grave"(Al-Itiqaad(p.107) of al-Bayhaqee.)

                                                       What is Hizb-ut-Tahrir?
  
Hizb-ut-Tahrir is a political party (not Islamic group) whose aim is to re-establish the Khilafah (Islamic State) that was lost by the Muslims in 1924 when the Ottoman Khilafah was destroyed.  

What is wrong with working to re-establish the Khilaafah?     

There is nothing wrong with working to re-establish the Khilaafah, in fact, all the Muslims are agreed that it is one of the most important obligations of Islam today to re-establish the Khilaafah, since the religion can never properly be established without it. The issue is that the Khilaafah will be re-established by Muslims on the Aqeedah (belief) of the Prophet (SAWS) and his Companions (Quraan 24:55). The Aqeedah of Hizb-ut-Tahrir is nowhere near the Aqeedah of the Prophet (SAWS) and his Companions nor is it the Aqeedah of Ahlus-Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah, the mainstream body of Muslims all over the World.  
Why is the Aqeedah of Hizb-ut-Tahrir different from the mainstream body of Muslims worldwide?  
Hizb-ut-Tahrir say that they do not accept Ahaad Hadeeth into their Aqeedah. Ahaad hadith are those hadith of the Prophet (SAWS) that were narrated by a few chains of narration. They say that because the hadith was narrated via a few chains of narration, there may be doubt in it, so we cannot take it into our belief.
All this Ahaad Hadith terminology is way above my head, what does not taking Ahaad Hadith into Aqeedah mean in simple terms?
In simple terms it means that Hizb-ut-Tahrir deny Imaan in the following articles of the Islamic Faith, because all of the following beliefs are established upon Ahaad Hadith:
1) The statement that Aadam (AS) is a Prophet, as well as others besides him who are not mentioned in the Qur'ân.
2) The fact that our Prophet Muhammad (Saws) is favored by Allaah (T) above all the other Prophets and Messengers.
3) The Great Intercession of the Messenger (Saws) on the Day of Judgement.
4) His (Saws) intercession for the people of this Ummah who committed major sins.
5) All the miracles of the Messenger (Saws) other than the Qur'ân.
6) Matters relating to the beginning of the creation.
7) The description of the angels, the jinn, the Jannah, and Janaham (the Fire).
8) The belief that both the Jannah and the Fire are presently existing.
9) The belief that the Black Stone is a stone from the Jannah.
10) The belief that the Prophet (Saws) looked into al-Jannah and saw all that Allaah has prepared for the pious believers.
11) The belief that ten (10) companions of the Messenger (Saws) were specifically promised the Jannah.
12) The belief that everyone will be questioned in his grave by two angels.
13) The belief in the punishment in the grave.
14) The belief that the Scale (al- Meezaan) which weighs the deeds on the Day of Judgement has two pans.
15) The belief in the Bridge (as-Siraat) which stretches over Jahanam.
16) The belief in the Fountain (al-Kawthar) of the Messenger (Saws), and that whoever drinks once from it on the Day of Judgement will never thirst after that.
17) The belief that seventy thousand (70,000) members of the Ummah of Muhammad (Saws) would enter the Jannah without reckoning.
18) The belief in the good and evil consequences of al-Qadar.
19) The belief that Allaah has written for everyone his happiness, his sadness, his provision, and the time of his death.
20) The belief that a Muslim who commits a major sin will not abide in Jahanam forever.
21) The belief in the Pen that was created by Allaah, and that He commanded it to write everything that will occur.
22) The belief that Allaah (T) has prohibited the earth from eating the bodies of the Messengers.
23) The belief of Descriptions of events on the Day of Resurrection excluding those mentioned in the Quraan.
24) The Ascent of the Prophet (SAWS) (Miraaj);
25) The Signs before the Last Day such as the descent of Prophet Isaa (AS),
26) Emergence of Dajjaal, and many others which are too many to list here.
What is the big deal about not having your Aqeedah the same as Ahlus-Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah?
In authentic hadith in Ahmad, Abu Dawud and Al-Hakim, on the authority of Muaawiyyah bin Abi Sufyaan, the Prophet (SAWS) said: “My Ummah will split into 73 sects, all of whom will be in the Hell Fire except one (the Saved Sect, known in Arabic as the Firqatun-Naajeyah).” Upon being asked which that Saved Sect was, he (SAWS) replied, “The one that I and my companions are on.” Therefore, if one’s Aqeedah is in contradiction to the Aqeedah of Ahlus-Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah and he dies upon that belief, he is under the threat of being sent by Allah (SWT) to the Hell Fire. If He wishes, He will punish him, or if He wishes, He will forgive him.
That is a very serious statement to make without offering any proof since you are effectively condemning the knowledgeable followers of this sect to the Hell Fire?  

Is there anything else worth knowing about Hizb-ut-Tahrir?

There are too many things like they say that it is permissible to view nude pictures (Al-Wa’ee publication, Q + A section, 29 May 1970CE), smoking is permissible, shaving the beard (thus imitating homosexuals) is permissible, listening to music is permissible.  

Where is this sect found?

Hizb-ut-Tahrir is found in Universities either in the Islamic societies, or under other ‘societies’ such as Millennium Society, 1924 Society, Pakistan Society (sometimes). They normally create other societies after Islamic societies ban them from preaching their deviant beliefs openly. On the Internet, they are found at their own web-site or at www.muslimstudent.org.uk, where they take care not to mention Hizb-ut-Tahrir too much in order to trap Muslim students with their deviant beliefs under the pretext of an innocent Muslim student resource site.

What activities does this sect engage in at universities?

Study-circles (on Khilaafah and politics), Tafseer classes (on Khilaafah and politics), talks and lectures (on Khilaafah and politics), Jumuah khutbahs (on Khilaafah and politics) and small iftaar gatherings in Ramadan (on Khilaafah and politics). They also attend lectures and study-circles by other Muslims on other topics and ask questions about Khilaafah and politics at the end. In addition, they specialise in getting Islamic Society prayer rooms closed down and getting Muslim students expelled from University, e.g. Brunel, Imperial, Kingston and UCL, where, to this day, the Muslims have no prayer room.

What methods do Hizb-ut-Tahrir use to recruit members at Universities?

Being very nice to new students, visiting them in Halls of Residences, accompanying them home on public transport or offering lifts to them, offering to help them out, inviting them to small dinner gatherings. All these visits and informal ‘social’ meetings are accompanied by discussions on Khilaafah, social, economic and political problems of the Muslims and politics because they rarely speak about anything else. They also stress the point that their methods are based on ‘clear’ evidences. However, the reality is that everything tends to be ‘clear’ except their Aqeedah, which they will try to refrain from discussing about, saying it is not a priority. If you are in doubt, you can always ask them if they work with Hizb-ut-Tahrir, or, if they will not give you a straight answer, ask other Muslims in the Islamic Society. Such interaction is only established for the sake of “Da’wah” and for working towards the re-establishment of Khilaafah. If they find that you are not responsive, the extreme care and attention that they have hitherto bestowed is immediately abandoned, and no further time and energy is wasted upon you.

Exclusive:

Is Hizb-ut-Tahrir another project of British MI6?

March 21, 2010
General Pervez Musharraf acknowledged in his book, ‘In the Line of Fire’, that Omar Saeed Sheikh – the man who was convicted for killing Wall Street Journal’s correspondent Daniel Pearl, in 2002, was recruited by MI6, the British intelligence agency.
We also know that Omar Saeed Sheikh conducted terrorist strikes in India and was also very close to the sectarian terrorist outfits in Pakistan besides being very close to the former Intelligence Bureau Head, Brig. (rtd) Ijaz Shah.  Omar Saeed was also linked (in the reports of the Associated Press, DAWN, CNN, Fox News, ABC News, among others) to transferring $100,000 to Mohd. Atta, who allegedly led the hijackings of 9/11.
So when people talk about a nexus of the Western intelligence agencies, Pakistani spy masters, and the terrorists in Pakistan, it is more than just conspiracy theory.  Some of the facts have been so well documented and in some instance, as in the case of Omar Saeed Sheikh, acknowledged by people like Musharraf and Benazir Bhutto.
This article provides links to material and reports that indicate that Hizb-ut-Tahrir is in fact a project of the MI6.
From 1986 to 1996, under the leadership of Syrian born Omar Bakri Muhammad, Hizb ut-Tahrir grew from a very small organization in Britain to a one of the most active Islamic organizations in the country. In 1996 Bakri split with Hizb ut-Tahrir over disagreements on policy, style and methods, and focused on another organization Al-Muhajiroun.
A report in Foreign Affairs Journal claims that Hizb ut-Tahrir “dominates” the British Islamist “scene” with some 8,500 members in the United Kingdom, compared to only 1,000 for a rival, Muslim Association of Britain.
Hizb ut-Tahrir in Britain emphasized the importance of Muslims choosing loyalty to their religion above loyalty to Britain or any other country. In Hizb ut-Tahrir’s view, Islam is anti-nationalisttransnational and pan-Islamic in nature. Although it was founded decades ago and is active in many countries, its activities in Central Asia are considered as of vital importance to MI6 as part of Anglo-American strategy to contain the Russians and since the last decade to counter the growing influence of China.
Following the 7 July 2005 London bombings the British government announced its intention to ban the organizationbut abandoned the ban. According to The Independent Blair “shelved the ban after warnings from police, intelligence chiefs, and civil liberties groups that it is a non-violent group, and driving it underground could backfire and according to the Observer because the Home Office believed a legal ban would not stick.
In July 2007, Leader of the Opposition David Cameron asked the new Prime Minister Gordon Brown why the organisation had not been banned from the United Kingdom, arguing it was an extremist group. Gordon Brown responded that more evidence would be needed before banning a group and, when pressed further, John Reid the previous home secretary stepped in arguing that there had already been two reviews of the group with insufficient evidence to justify a ban.
In November of 2009, Mr Cameron again questioned the Government over Hizb ut-Tahrir, claiming that government Pathfinder fund aimed at combating violent extremism was being used to fund schools run by an organisation with links to extremism.
The following links are worth a closer study.
1. The first report is that of UK Daily Telegraph, titled ” Islamists who want to destroy the state get £100,000 funding”,  dated Oct. 25, 2009
2.  The second one is a report published by the Executive Intelligence Review, ”Tajikistan-Another Victim of British-Saudi Terror“, dated August 7. 2009
3. The third report by the UK’s Times, “British Islamists plot against Pakistan“, dated  July 4, 2009, does not link MI6 directly but is silent on one fact. How come the British Muslims belonging to the Hizb  while followed so closely by the British intelligence and known to even the Times, are able to travel so frequently between the UK and Pakistan?
4. MI6 agents in Dehli detained, February 18, 2010
The linkages between the so-called Islamic militants and the Western spy agencies, supported by the reports of the western media itself, suggest that some of the so-called extremist or militant groups are merely tools in the much bigger game, called the “Great Game” and MI6 is naturally a major player.
Unfortunately, Pakistanis have become the cannon fodder of the not just the Great Game but also of the ‘turf battles’ among the MI6, the CIA, and the ISI.  Of course, the fact that many of the extremists have gotten out of their control has made things worse but the fight against the terrorists seems like a losing battle in this part of the world because either the ‘old terrorist’ is eliminated and replaced by a new one as Benazir Bhutto put it on Business Plus TV in one of her last interviews, and a ‘good terrorist” is even supported by some of the most prominent figures in the media leave alone the much maligned Pakistani establishment.

How taxpayers are still funding the extremists

Millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money is still being paid to groups linked to Islamist extremism, more than a year after David Cameron vowed to outlaw the practice.

Hizb ut Tahrir and MI6 connection

Dr. Jassim Taqui
Islamabad—the ISPR spokesman Major. Gen. Athar Abbas disclosed that the arrested Brigadier Ali Khan and four other majors were detained for questioning on their links with London-based Islamist party Hizb - ut – Tahrir (HuT). HuT is an international political party whose proclaimed aim is the establishment of a global Islamic Caliphate. The party claims that it desists violence and that it seeks to achieve its objective through peaceful means. However, security agencies found something mysterious and dangerous about the party and banned it in 2003.

No grounds were given by the authorities on banning HuT. However, experts believe that the party enjoys close ties with MI6, which stood with the party despite complaints from Arab and Central Asian countries about its link with the militant parties that seek to destabilize these countries. Former President Gen. Pervez Musharraf also complained to the British authorities that HuT was engaged in propaganda drive against military leadership.

The party has been active in the Middle East. It sought to overthrow Arab regimes by penetrating their armed forces in an attempt to bring change by military coups. Therefore, one after another, all Arab countries banned HuT. Following Geronimo Operation, HuT revived its activities against the civilian and military leadership through processions, pamphlets, posters, SMS and write-ups in the internet especially in Facebook and Twitter. From 1986 to 1996, under leadership of Syrian born Omar Bakri Muhammad, HuT grew from a very small organization in Britain to a one of the most active Islamic organization in the country. In 1996 Bakri split with HuT over disagreement on policy , style and methods, and focused on another organization Al-Mujahajiroun . HuT is legal in Britain. It dominates the Islamic scene with some 8500 members. The SCO nations are very worried on the activities of HuT in Central Asia. The party leaders themselves never explain why is the party so interested in this region. However, experts believe that HuT is used by the MI6 as part of the Anglo-American strategy to contain the influence of Russians and Chinese in Central Asian Republics. HuT is reportedly linked to the Muslim Brotherhood which has long been a front for the CIA and MI6. the Brotherhood has been used by MI6 and CIA to weaken the independent governments in the Middle East. Former DCM of Egyptian Embassy in Pakistan Dr. Reza Shihata established in his Ph.D. thesis that the Brotherhood was linked with the CIA. He relied heavily on “ see-only” references in the library of the American Congress on the secret contacts between the Brotherhood and CIA.

Presently, the HuT has been given the task of destabilizing Pakistan by targeting the armed forces , which is under attacks by TTP and imperial powers.The real game of HuT is implement the foreign powers agenda in Pakistan by demoralizing and discrediting the Pakistani soldiers and attempting to break military discipline. 

Continued..................



 

Copyright © 2010 Pak Saviour Blogger Template by Dzignine